Nonprofit website audit

Know what to fix before you rebuild.

A clear-eyed review of UX, SEO, accessibility, performance, conversion paths, analytics, and CMS maintainability — including our branded Institutional Website Risk Review when governance risk is the real story.

Audit categories

What we look at — and why it matters operationally.

  • 01

    UX & information architecture

    Navigation clarity, audience pathways, and whether people can find programs without staff intervention.

  • 02

    SEO foundation

    Indexation, architecture, thin or competing pages, and readiness for redesign without traffic cliffs.

  • 03

    Accessibility

    Keyboard use, semantics, forms, media, and whether accessibility is owned after launch.

  • 04

    Mobile & performance

    Core journeys on small screens, load behavior, and friction that kills donations mid-flow.

  • 05

    Conversion & donations

    Donation and signup paths, forms, thank-you states, and drop-off you can actually see.

  • 06

    Analytics & CMS reality

    GA4 usefulness, CRM handoffs, publishing capacity, integrations, and governance debt.

Branded assessment

Institutional Website Risk Review

When boards and procurement need more than a UX critique, we run our structured risk review: twelve operational risk areas, scoring bands, and procurement-ready questions. Searchers call it a nonprofit website audit. We keep the branded name where institutional stakes are high.

Explore the full risk framework →
CauseHouse clipboard illustration representing structured website risk review
After the audit

Recommendations before capital.

You leave with prioritized actions — not a sales script that always ends in a redesign. Some teams need remediation and maintenance. Some need migration discipline. Some are ready to rebuild.

Hands reviewing analytics charts on a tablet at a desk
Questions

Before we score the house.

How is a nonprofit website audit different from a redesign?
An audit diagnoses. A redesign rebuilds. Many organizations need governance, accessibility, or conversion fixes before spending capital on a full visual rebuild — and some should not rebuild at all yet.
What is the Institutional Website Risk Review?
CauseHouse’s branded assessment for nonprofits, associations, and public agencies. It scores operational risks — governance, migration, accessibility, publishing, integrations — before anyone commits redesign budget. The full framework lives on our approach page.
Who should purchase an audit?
Leadership or boards deciding whether to rebuild; comms teams inheriting a fragile CMS; procurement officers evaluating vendors; anyone who needs prioritized recommendations instead of a vague “redesign” impulse.
What happens after the audit?
You get a prioritized plan. From there you may remediate in place, engage maintenance, migrate carefully, or redesign — with evidence, not habit.
What are typical deliverables?
Findings by category, severity and priority, recommended next investments, and optional deep-dive into the Institutional Website Risk Review scoring model when institutional risk is the real question.
Start building

Ready to build a stronger house for your mission?