Platform · Accessibility

WCAG 2.2 AA remediation

Remediation is how existing nonprofit sites catch up to WCAG 2.2 AA-oriented expectations. We prioritize real user journeys, fix what matters first, and document residual risk — without promising legal magic.

Talk about this platformAll platforms
Best suited for

Where this platform earns its place.

  • Sites with audit findings or complaints
  • Redesigns that need a remediation bridge
  • Teams preparing RFPs with WCAG language
Platform implementation map for nonprofit technology stacks
In depth

How we think about this stack.

Prioritize journeys, not PDF score theater

Donate, apply, contact, and core program paths come first. A perfect automated score with a broken keyboard donate path is failure.

Evidence over vibes

We combine automated scans with manual keyboard and screen-reader checks on critical flows.

Governance after the sprint

Without editor rules and a maintenance path, accessibility regresses. Remediation should leave an operating model.

Clipboard for audits, checklists, and CRM hygiene

Where it performs well

  • Critical path remediation
  • WordPress template fixes

Common limitations

  • Third-party tools may block full AA on some pages
  • No legal certification
CauseHouse services

What we typically provide.

  • Audit-informed remediation plan

    Prioritized backlog with effort clarity against WCAG 2.2 AA-oriented goals.

  • Critical journey fix sprints

    Donate/apply/contact paths before sitewide perfection fantasy.

  • Manual keyboard & AT testing

    Evidence on real flows — not score chasing alone.

  • Content remediation support

    Headings, link text, contrast, and media fixes editors own.

  • Retest & residual-risk docs

    What improved, what remains, and why.

  • Governance after the sprint

    Editor rules and maintenance so accessibility does not regress.

  • Redesign sequencing advice

    When not to polish a dying theme before migration.

Engagement shape

How work usually unfolds.

  1. 01

    Discovery

    Goals, data ownership, and staffing capacity before tool configuration.

  2. 02

    Design & configure

    Fields, journeys, and integrations that match how work actually happens.

  3. 03

    Validate

    Test gifts, forms, reports, and failure paths with real scenarios.

  4. 04

    Train & stabilize

    Documentation, training, and a clear ownership model after go-live.

Ownership

Who owns what after go-live.

  • Your team

    Data accuracy, gift coding standards, and day-to-day use.

  • CauseHouse

    Architecture in scope, integration design, and training materials.

  • Shared

    Change control after launch and vendor relationship decisions.

Migration considerations

If a redesign is imminent, do not spend the whole budget polishing a dying theme — sequence remediation with migration.

Integrations

  • CMS constraints
  • Embeds and payment tools
  • Document and media processes

Accessibility

CauseHouse builds and remediates toward WCAG-oriented outcomes where the stack allows. We do not provide legal advice or guarantee ADA compliance.

Common project mistakes

  • Chasing automated scores only
  • Ignoring content remediation
  • No retest after fixes
Alternatives

Realistic comparisons.

Accessible WordPress development

Build-time accessibility.

Accessibility service

Service overview.

Related proof & services

Go deeper.

Website accessibility

Remediation inside CauseHouse accessibility work.

Website accessibility →Website audit →Accessible WordPress →
Questions

Before you standardize on a stack.

Do you remediate PDFs?
Only when explicitly scoped. We do not claim a default accessible-PDF factory.
AA or AAA?
We typically target AA-oriented outcomes unless you have a documented AAA requirement.
Start building

Ready to build a stronger house for your mission?

Work with us